{"id":"W1533468349","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2242","title":"Shaping the Adversary Culture","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Rhetorical question; Adversary; Reflexivity; Presumption; Epistemology; Style (visual arts); Face (sociological concept); Rhetoric; Subject (documents); Sociology; Rhetorical device; Sensationalism; Order (exchange); Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Media studies; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Literature; Computer security; Social science; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02842414,0.0007478252,0.000575084,0.002931605,0.01862163,0.02357033,0.002679823,0.003713569,0.006810112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03649564,0.0005605774,0.0004875247,0.001286574,0.047073,0.0190245,0.0212547,0.009861224,0.001293599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008622258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004757425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002722981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002419843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9684145,0.0222073,0.0007448264,0.002748378,0.004042123,0.001842781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764764,0.01439864,0.002151147,0.002251108,0.00232086,0.002401772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002409497,0.00002131616,0.001005202,0.00005201314,0.00001615452,0.0003072257,0.1756476,0.0001969633,0.0009148325,0.8116196,0.002404827,0.007790169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003346591,0.0001041735,0.001269068,0.0005881328,0.00004687624,0.0006354519,0.1701196,0.002323353,0.003107826,0.3505049,0.4711895,0.00007762801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2617612,0.004293415,0.07845747,0.08897811,0.001250596,0.0001597318,0.00006631684,0.0002747574,0.5647584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813445,0.0004870771,0.002346024,0.002479474,0.0001653896,0.00004181298,0.00001450086,0.0001236926,0.01299758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02842414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.150323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1129043919024924,"score_gpt":0.2664940580452732,"score_spread":0.1535896661427808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}