{"id":"W1534147737","doi":"10.4319/lom.2011.9.524","title":"Fin‐icky samples: an assessment of shark fin as a source material for stable isotope analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Limnology and Oceanography Methods","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"National Marine Fisheries Service; Earthwatch Institute","keywords":"Fin; Fish fin; Dorsal fin; Carcharhinus; Biology; Pelagic zone; Population; Reef; Ecology; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Materials science; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001775913,0.000224562,0.0006611079,0.0004025112,0.0002044536,0.0000180213,0.0004258855,0.0002700892,0.005820335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009636681,0.0002031968,0.0003036335,0.0009567545,0.0006385796,0.0002015902,0.000248897,0.0001418372,0.000005667967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002250441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000190786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005505781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003918779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975033,0.0008235194,0.0004800358,0.0006083451,0.0001213923,0.0004633592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986845,0.0003556249,0.0002745585,0.0005448367,0.00002675126,0.0001136901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001933049,0.0003630703,0.9759556,0.00002282272,0.001173072,0.00000304249,0.00173358,0.0002073967,0.006411528,0.002316294,0.000154181,0.01146608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007929009,0.001576591,0.9373877,0.000004950248,0.002260856,0.0000111797,0.00102441,0.004856104,0.02952544,0.01170219,0.01036814,0.0004895421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8089211,0.00004971849,0.1885699,0.00003360156,0.0001291683,0.0002679884,0.00003528237,0.0000352407,0.001958026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5354813,0.00005574045,0.4639398,0.0002300947,0.00001988925,0.00005528246,0.00003734729,0.00001365119,0.0001667961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2753699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03717359849157772,"score_gpt":0.355260498339707,"score_spread":0.3180868998481293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}