{"id":"W1535564063","doi":"10.1088/0004-637x/752/1/69","title":"THE BORON-TO-CARBON ABUNDANCE RATIO AND GALACTIC PROPAGATION OF COSMIC RADIATION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Astrophysical Journal","topic":"Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry","field":"Medicine","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Cosmic ray; Physics; Astrophysics; Lambda; Exponent; Power law; Natural abundance; Galaxy; Isotopes of boron; Path length; Spectral line; Energy (signal processing); Attenuation length; Computational physics; Boron; Nuclear physics; Astronomy; Optics; Statistics; Isotope","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002570361,0.0001762215,0.000175139,0.001087412,0.0001112129,0.0006282895,0.000209483,0.0004660329,0.004035604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001195692,0.0001943769,0.0001460989,0.0007350421,0.0001518861,0.0003854827,0.0001669582,0.000251719,0.001097745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003295417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000150139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003036397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002195807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999884,0.00002970288,0.00001046025,0.00003275222,0.00002657792,0.00001645592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993874,0.0001843191,0.0002054156,0.00003232724,0.0001090071,0.00008158697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00667874,0.00009794668,0.7105931,0.0003979917,0.0005437874,0.001125524,0.0003379861,0.003051202,0.1721947,0.003629189,0.003020104,0.09832963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004748546,0.0003584013,0.9512146,0.00005472136,0.0002479469,0.003694773,0.0002436686,0.002958814,0.03630484,0.001266335,0.003559882,0.00004857952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764869,0.007625816,0.002700764,0.0002738604,0.00004084445,0.00000998568,0.002303909,0.0001661453,0.0103918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964551,0.0009823815,0.0005307768,0.00002833893,0.00001743244,0.000002535119,0.0006454648,0.00003861128,0.001299377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004035604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01350039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008256689423158632,"score_gpt":0.2568350059054563,"score_spread":0.2485783164822976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}