{"id":"W1536511938","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.43463","title":"Food Safety Incidents, Collateral Damage and Trade Policy Responses: China-Canada Agri-Food Trade","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Food safety; Collateral damage; Business; International trade; China; Food safety risk analysis; Food packaging; Globalization; Commercial policy; Trade barrier; Collateral; Food policy; Market failure; Food security; Economics; Market economy; Agriculture; Political science; Engineering; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009183647,0.0003226517,0.0002402204,0.001462582,0.005278033,0.004109438,0.0007094771,0.001439743,0.00702982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002394217,0.0001213137,0.0003107435,0.003200814,0.003208357,0.0009644332,0.001492399,0.001077382,0.0001531372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08438806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06508525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9810783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9871329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990335,0.0001155944,0.00002208168,0.00006780315,0.00034028,0.0004208968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983869,0.0003143213,0.0003244063,0.00004428903,0.0006896174,0.0002405436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002715436,0.0003337391,0.2767813,0.0004361295,0.0001519717,0.003112362,0.02615432,0.02916351,0.001014897,0.5532988,0.05845064,0.05083076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001017346,0.0001873723,0.5374686,0.0005500434,0.0003452403,0.0003660021,0.1881515,0.04786924,0.002287234,0.05936341,0.1630651,0.0002444955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8097342,0.002278341,0.001018985,0.02233915,0.00009320915,0.0001457414,0.0008988225,0.0000289533,0.1634624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859167,0.00130497,0.0001936884,0.0003789593,0.000008873501,0.00001234071,0.0001408986,0.000002897551,0.01204081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08438806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6122811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0256355679491197,"score_gpt":0.2867876879099345,"score_spread":0.2611521199608148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}