{"id":"W1536958512","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01606.x","title":"Assessing the Value of the Umbrella‐Species Concept for Conservation Planning with Meta‐Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Ecology and Conservation Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Nature Conservation; Geography; Computer science; Biology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1046514,0.005088178,0.01125644,0.02537028,0.001624168,0.006817621,0.007039805,0.002724304,0.005435005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2451713,0.001843622,0.03527409,0.02054263,0.002072081,0.006002992,0.005552023,0.004316524,0.0003754782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002872382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004130128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008238372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007837817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8984269,0.07886103,0.007294788,0.0106543,0.00376602,0.0009970008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6426504,0.3276404,0.009343438,0.01526209,0.003555156,0.001548518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001466878,0.00008735118,0.05862061,0.0357604,0.8557954,0.0004453938,0.000635252,0.01677457,0.0009828907,0.003928731,0.001862506,0.02364009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001161525,0.001013478,0.02688114,0.01000158,0.8626809,0.0003337049,0.001160638,0.05867541,0.001291861,0.02719543,0.009245783,0.0003586405],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2120205,0.3580742,0.3861495,0.009020718,0.002898811,0.003824002,0.02093275,0.002796685,0.004282855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8369434,0.01200391,0.1413792,0.001353047,0.0003408363,0.003631868,0.003648727,0.0004229593,0.0002760861],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1046514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5534563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2668606067298568,"score_gpt":0.386536247878652,"score_spread":0.1196756411487952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}