{"id":"W1537376986","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2572724","title":"Blockholder Exit Threats in the Presence of Private Benefits of Control: A Quasi-Experiment from China's Split-Share Structure Reform","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; China; Private benefits of control; Shock (circulatory); Control (management); Difference in differences; Business; Propensity score matching; Monetary economics; Exit strategy; Stock (firearms); Crowding out; Finance; Shareholder; Economics; Econometrics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008771648,0.0008790381,0.001510726,0.0004555297,0.003040878,0.002349891,0.00163872,0.003415602,0.01198591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007845594,0.0006639337,0.0007334659,0.0003678759,0.004937816,0.002398852,0.001836071,0.003028405,0.0009832494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001879316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004074543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008109521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01048653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954267,0.001672079,0.000225063,0.0008266534,0.0003844342,0.001465052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878964,0.005048749,0.002964704,0.00193947,0.0004617972,0.001688968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1846349,0.4935581,0.1206906,0.0009981509,0.00104315,0.001856934,0.02609473,0.009029155,0.05270314,0.05406233,0.005959998,0.04936879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.08070584,0.3842178,0.4083307,0.0002385191,0.001841239,0.0002354146,0.02976934,0.03058123,0.0281568,0.02203668,0.01324951,0.000636953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988031,0.00001138549,0.0001135193,0.00007873013,0.00001410145,0.0001939139,0.00004424695,0.000005022744,0.0007359786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970908,0.0000179065,0.0001798092,0.0000929482,0.00001716911,0.0003846342,0.00006210058,0.0000029742,0.002151687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01198591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04638946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0173061867903231,"score_gpt":0.22732722767701,"score_spread":0.2100210408866869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}