{"id":"W1538354909","doi":"10.1038/sc.2015.87","title":"Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part III: outcomes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spinal Cord","topic":"Spinal Cord Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Griffith University; Transport Accident Commission; University of Otago; Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation","keywords":"Medicine; Spinal cord injury; Stakeholder; Spinal cord; Vertebral canal; Process (computing); Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Physical therapy; Central nervous system disease; Surgery; Psychiatry; Public relations","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6156777,0.002212974,0.003233374,0.011485,0.006178293,0.01431896,0.006768373,0.01095889,0.007255431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5279741,0.002869502,0.004496858,0.00869881,0.004977145,0.01448811,0.02261659,0.009975444,0.00296039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02666817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2345752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005430929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01076939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4386955,0.4407366,0.06950688,0.008150113,0.03653218,0.006378827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4120323,0.3406471,0.04906168,0.02822542,0.149793,0.02024051],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001216844,0.002487516,0.008004792,0.1124876,0.002295296,0.001748814,0.06840482,0.006255215,0.009718039,0.07769736,0.07649855,0.6331851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005474803,0.004787116,0.0183,0.2249971,0.003337071,0.001598216,0.06982891,0.01239048,0.01424846,0.2033811,0.4404563,0.001200547],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02107415,0.01452088,0.3261546,0.1591478,0.003647831,0.4512602,0.001811214,0.000972531,0.02141088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06420261,0.005154332,0.7411601,0.01150503,0.000331362,0.1739359,0.0009083882,0.0001129796,0.0026893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3843223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4739379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7420570084752109,"score_gpt":0.577620473369029,"score_spread":0.1644365351061819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}