{"id":"W1539071251","doi":"10.1023/a:1025895317253","title":"Getting into Shape: An Empirical Comparison of Traditional Truss-Based Morphometric Methods with a Newer Geometric Method Applied to New World Cichlids","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Biology of Fishes","topic":"Morphological variations and asymmetry","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Universität Konstanz","keywords":"Morphometrics; Shape analysis (program analysis); Variation (astronomy); Truss; Set (abstract data type); Trait; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Geometric data analysis; Statistics; Computer science; Biology; Ecology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001008831,0.0002620315,0.0007374014,0.0008572128,0.00009011565,0.000009930278,0.0002643171,0.0001841359,0.002339762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004456175,0.0002034973,0.0001212741,0.001613529,0.0001936798,0.00005627545,0.00005080287,0.0002424842,0.000008621923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008589359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004032392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002181467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005103232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978351,0.0004639753,0.0006743954,0.0004815061,0.0002490884,0.0002959532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966136,0.002472591,0.0003568609,0.0003313937,0.00001052006,0.0002150447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004917445,0.0075788,0.5136435,0.0001375315,0.0005224586,0.000007305449,0.0009959857,0.001221789,0.202818,0.02640528,0.006234275,0.2399433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005261298,0.005952676,0.4673102,0.00006114128,0.0005273266,0.00003127262,0.001351374,0.003258534,0.4425747,0.05711763,0.01492061,0.001633298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.454113,0.00009569406,0.5442721,0.0001584573,0.0000405725,0.0002741088,0.00003529049,0.00002278322,0.0009880185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4781906,9.828027e-7,0.521479,0.0001937515,0.00002265819,0.00001876989,0.00003942008,0.00001326929,0.00004160255],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2397566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1008627421782914,"score_gpt":0.3857251123316907,"score_spread":0.2848623701533993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}