{"id":"W1539417924","doi":"10.1007/11766247_6","title":"Satisfaction Equilibrium: Achieving Cooperation in Incomplete Information Games","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Observability; Nash equilibrium; Equilibrium selection; Solution concept; Context (archaeology); Mathematical economics; Complete information; Rational agent; Correlated equilibrium; Deliberation; Pareto principle; Game theory; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mathematical optimization; Best response; Repeated game; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003776981,0.001323595,0.001631815,0.0007284446,0.001067685,0.002710727,0.00241995,0.002585489,0.004214859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007220657,0.0005466627,0.001162207,0.001655868,0.002553028,0.003866341,0.00301879,0.002602938,0.0008252166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008886563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001622395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007078177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005755408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960311,0.002304134,0.0001651212,0.0003104792,0.000746786,0.0004423681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963514,0.002552406,0.0002483914,0.0002666521,0.0003477965,0.0002334806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002460195,0.0001487326,0.0003178416,0.0002698928,0.00008346119,0.0001750457,0.0007117316,0.05994521,0.003282682,0.902436,0.003972246,0.02841116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009630051,0.0001238826,0.0001115293,0.00002832618,0.00002122628,0.00007034278,0.0001390126,0.1951071,0.001018089,0.8017112,0.001556484,0.00001661473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06267292,0.0002893426,0.8971191,0.001430967,0.00008494042,0.0002549627,0.0001200024,0.0002296933,0.03779804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8159392,0.0005473546,0.1678054,0.0004085769,0.0001812406,0.0009460389,0.000316421,0.0001199814,0.01373562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004214859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01997483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03915314013422875,"score_gpt":0.3091881491993835,"score_spread":0.2700350090651548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}