{"id":"W1539417924","doi":"10.1007/11766247_6","title":"Satisfaction Equilibrium: Achieving Cooperation in Incomplete Information Games","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Observability; Nash equilibrium; Equilibrium selection; Solution concept; Context (archaeology); Mathematical economics; Complete information; Rational agent; Correlated equilibrium; Deliberation; Pareto principle; Game theory; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mathematical optimization; Best response; Repeated game; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002854263,0.0003151759,0.0004122127,0.001491981,0.000180668,0.0009027633,0.001140816,0.0002448501,0.0001419797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005389625,0.0002687722,0.00008116653,0.001110371,0.0004939332,0.001901378,0.00039955,0.0005761125,0.0003045667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002693823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002589881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001301052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007038024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964034,0.00008471653,0.001097571,0.0007498937,0.00130394,0.0003604545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970881,0.001157097,0.0004888558,0.0008481382,0.0003420473,0.00007571064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000118667,0.00001067063,0.001555622,0.00000869914,0.000001769845,0.000002814172,0.0004946939,0.247757,0.000604909,0.01692387,0.0001199773,0.7325081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004760172,0.000120315,0.02595294,0.0002998633,0.000008597789,0.00003833462,0.000002490672,0.3304683,0.0008615469,0.6266456,0.01430356,0.0008225297],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0188362,0.00005805173,0.9689834,0.0006281076,0.0005635457,0.0004716313,0.00002046211,0.0000579333,0.01038066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844809,0.000006366572,0.01430378,0.0006084814,0.0002204925,0.0000156874,0.00003462148,0.00001303461,0.0003166349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9656447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03915314013422875,"score_gpt":0.3091881491993835,"score_spread":0.2700350090651548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}