{"id":"W1539557712","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2008v33n2a1977","title":"“More and Better” Research? Critical Communication Studies and the Problem of Policy Relevance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Scholarship; Reflexivity; Field (mathematics); Political science; Research policy; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Management science; Social science; Public administration; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004239326,0.00006161784,0.0002167272,0.0001865209,0.002394128,0.00003860895,0.0007758635,0.0000538702,0.000003757383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004016553,0.00004670614,0.00003330918,0.0003499514,0.00809715,0.0002426173,0.0001434975,0.0004379717,5.886268e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001511064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008703138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02916029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07612282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971875,0.001889701,0.0003820219,0.00005849357,0.0002852798,0.0001970281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936965,0.004067996,0.000242923,0.0005526841,0.001252744,0.0001871986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044495,0.00001761666,0.004482468,0.00003978443,0.00007323985,0.000001704001,0.2744716,0.000002591394,0.00001671876,0.6807624,0.004375326,0.03571214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001895358,0.0001949147,0.0380071,0.001193249,0.00009004739,0.0001069234,0.2255662,0.00006260338,0.0000495893,0.3343944,0.398183,0.000256571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3040724,0.2030067,0.00002465171,0.4819084,0.00003317393,0.0003768651,0.00000360942,0.000006237362,0.01056801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8586382,0.1372549,0.003741088,0.0002436334,0.00004914419,0.00001119307,8.681031e-7,0.000004854048,0.00005609872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5545658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1402617387837956,"score_gpt":0.4342191760624148,"score_spread":0.2939574372786192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}