{"id":"W1539557712","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2008v33n2a1977","title":"“More and Better” Research? Critical Communication Studies and the Problem of Policy Relevance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Scholarship; Reflexivity; Field (mathematics); Political science; Research policy; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Management science; Social science; Public administration; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4876471,0.002255602,0.00534186,0.01651742,0.03006611,0.05022792,0.0112738,0.02532338,0.006971836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6242932,0.001933333,0.001502897,0.01694895,0.2079832,0.0961379,0.02334753,0.03517285,0.0007060213],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07367327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1333666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06150388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03814594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.396941,0.542788,0.01020049,0.01668651,0.02550186,0.007882093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1830028,0.7200209,0.01893489,0.02989617,0.03855056,0.00959462],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007487195,0.00005130282,0.001007646,0.001652931,0.00008298421,0.00009048369,0.03630581,0.0002610822,0.00006768505,0.9170567,0.01719541,0.02615314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009080899,0.00003040499,0.0004633509,0.002898944,0.00004370197,0.00006390947,0.03534492,0.0003552082,0.000149146,0.9158191,0.04469366,0.00004698442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002537666,0.03123911,0.006887131,0.9472463,0.002810552,0.0001143926,0.00003603967,0.000027586,0.009101297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6588137,0.04875498,0.03236528,0.2310517,0.02270021,0.002016683,0.0001043822,0.0002146674,0.003978332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9263268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6318225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1402617387837956,"score_gpt":0.4342191760624148,"score_spread":0.2939574372786192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}