{"id":"W1539905548","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12110","title":"Bilateral and Trilateral Natural Resource and Biodiversity Governance in<scp>N</scp>orth<scp>A</scp>merica: Organizations, Networks, and Inclusion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Technocracy; Bureaucracy; Typology; Corporate governance; Natural resource; Biodiversity; Political science; Environmental governance; Diversity (politics); Environmental resource management; Public administration; Environmental planning; Business; Sociology; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001744465,0.0001862405,0.0003315437,0.00216248,0.001026834,0.004831822,0.0004378567,0.001078969,0.003235545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001734243,0.0001356789,0.0001671265,0.005556785,0.003284809,0.002325347,0.001556446,0.001089593,0.0002140949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004486144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007254902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04159891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1197978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987796,0.0005072172,0.0000719446,0.0001462433,0.000347271,0.0001477665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976982,0.0009467854,0.0005112904,0.0001164201,0.0004819446,0.0002453042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000547888,0.00009684074,0.01688651,0.004912083,0.00009137142,0.0005309467,0.009341945,0.0008322217,0.0005641341,0.4356609,0.09893199,0.4320964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008711595,0.00002625315,0.02723967,0.005865398,0.0000491453,0.0002725735,0.01354221,0.0002836236,0.0001907208,0.03340426,0.9190989,0.00001852526],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02418746,0.8383254,0.001391366,0.03791009,0.001679774,0.00004236122,0.0001639191,0.00002281819,0.09627689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3073999,0.6700909,0.001522072,0.003441779,0.001612903,0.00007503301,0.0002531137,0.00001416277,0.01559023],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08271354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02683700822268356,"score_gpt":0.2902144259546189,"score_spread":0.2633774177319354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}