{"id":"W1540087547","doi":"10.1103/physreva.87.022342","title":"Optimal pair-generation rate for entanglement-based quantum key distribution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review A","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Quantum key distribution; Coincidence; Quantum entanglement; Detector; Visibility; Coincidence counting; Key (lock); Channel (broadcasting); Physics; Quantum channel; Key generation; Quantum; Computer science; Statistical physics; Optics; Quantum mechanics; Algorithm; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002063967,0.0007103938,0.001179007,0.0006442085,0.0007389685,0.001487158,0.001581527,0.001489419,0.002817168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009414314,0.000679659,0.0004771377,0.0006698891,0.001884382,0.003552834,0.001387618,0.001447944,0.0008592138],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002003244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001249373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008256748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005779609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991263,0.0003333445,0.00002666033,0.0001422585,0.0002161214,0.0001552667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976731,0.001504038,0.0003055483,0.0002181318,0.0001800534,0.0001190785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000240782,0.00009089745,0.0007087602,0.00008781077,0.0000158168,0.0001377807,0.00009665156,0.7030084,0.01133835,0.2788245,0.0007946866,0.004655545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001192894,0.00001707997,0.00007510817,0.000009207971,0.000004080701,0.00002750325,0.000008137219,0.9653063,0.001889251,0.03244029,0.0001920114,0.00001907898],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2014911,0.0007544308,0.7786157,0.001173545,0.0001041469,0.0001125381,0.0002387613,0.0004386283,0.01707125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817681,0.0002744965,0.0158427,0.00006585842,0.00001962877,0.00008044226,0.00006187116,0.0000962877,0.001790517],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002817168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01453459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02457217101072206,"score_gpt":0.2863672529964038,"score_spread":0.2617950819856817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}