{"id":"W1540087547","doi":"10.1103/physreva.87.022342","title":"Optimal pair-generation rate for entanglement-based quantum key distribution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review A","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Quantum key distribution; Coincidence; Quantum entanglement; Detector; Visibility; Coincidence counting; Key (lock); Channel (broadcasting); Physics; Quantum channel; Key generation; Quantum; Computer science; Statistical physics; Optics; Quantum mechanics; Algorithm; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002450794,0.0001194313,0.000180734,0.00002214591,0.0001051943,0.0001331094,0.0002744305,0.00001498242,0.00003359899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006217171,0.00009451055,0.0001987968,0.0002943942,0.00002119814,0.0006461644,0.00003454232,0.00005301235,0.0002419854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002542367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003282127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005259784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.805886e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991001,0.00006955225,0.0002582708,0.0001855938,0.0001792355,0.0002072874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992784,0.00006274199,0.0001242586,0.0002826566,0.0001609974,0.00009094815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003751798,0.0002615304,0.00003546014,0.0006256622,0.00001928603,2.662528e-7,0.00008742999,0.0001497315,0.003468224,0.8477225,0.09129491,0.05633125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003005058,0.0001481271,0.0002530183,0.0001452556,0.00001705464,3.634892e-7,0.000003613566,0.9134916,0.004381464,0.003372083,0.07771479,0.0001720977],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02697524,0.0007340694,0.9662886,0.004800554,0.0001223419,0.0008837106,0.00001609032,0.0001080026,0.00007138359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851364,0.0003155777,0.007949403,0.005105608,0.0001640852,0.0009323985,0.0003788051,0.000007642677,0.00001005997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9583392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3854028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02457217101072206,"score_gpt":0.2863672529964038,"score_spread":0.2617950819856817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}