{"id":"W1541335921","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720130901.1064","title":"On the Preservation of Cultural Other in Literary Translation: A Case Study of the Translation of Chinese Literary Works","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literary translation; Diversity (politics); Cultural diversity; Key (lock); Cultural translation; Linguistics; Literature; Obstacle; Order (exchange); Translation (biology); Literary science; Sociology; History; Aesthetics; Literary criticism; Philosophy; Art; Computer science; Anthropology; Business; Chemistry; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01351005,0.001039175,0.0008867963,0.002408212,0.03289355,0.01044673,0.002265356,0.004338063,0.003792129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02799431,0.0005374872,0.0007500019,0.00564315,0.02608062,0.007025627,0.01044443,0.004724616,0.0005303037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008628672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009199051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01961162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03292846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9808213,0.01482093,0.0006248606,0.0006395391,0.001860003,0.001233413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750601,0.01892202,0.001929649,0.001385355,0.001568784,0.001134043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002775999,0.00004083062,0.00107556,0.00009638261,0.000005459712,0.005066485,0.982049,0.00004769747,0.0003659472,0.005423585,0.0004228032,0.005378447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001534591,0.00006925833,0.002127405,0.0002479872,0.00002624869,0.003151143,0.9735327,0.0002670665,0.0008422112,0.001509069,0.01818544,0.00002614264],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9333668,0.0008344902,0.00287773,0.004548118,0.0001353784,0.0002134514,0.00002482632,0.00002482121,0.05797423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920884,0.0006103751,0.001100168,0.0003836376,0.00004426834,0.00006866256,0.00001861251,0.00003415465,0.005651673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03289355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0714488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.065808725619703,"score_gpt":0.2891830945837003,"score_spread":0.2233743689639973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}