{"id":"W1543578334","doi":"","title":"Good and Bad Sharia: Australia's Mixed Response to Islamic Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Studies and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sharia; Law; Legal pluralism; Islam; Jurisdiction; Pluralism (philosophy); Negotiation; Political science; Blueprint; Project commissioning; Sociology; Globalization; Comparative law; Publishing; Legal realism; History; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00256893,0.0001105778,0.0001471524,0.00005241152,0.0009734617,0.00009350999,0.0002479921,0.00007643526,0.0001183949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001121121,0.00009386678,0.00006170308,0.0001733914,0.0001842007,0.0001771189,0.00005986148,0.0006912241,0.00008131054],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004528316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005843657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0361693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2170835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973549,0.0002597095,0.0001642337,0.0001414582,0.0002254882,0.001854244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995964,0.00006957699,0.00006423689,0.00008722806,0.00005845691,0.0001240671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001795219,0.00002107051,0.0007473264,7.854359e-7,0.00006470516,0.000004182303,0.01665614,1.71505e-7,0.0001291031,0.980211,0.000700449,0.00128559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007443849,0.0009726504,0.01830584,0.00002239533,0.00006641688,0.0001173415,0.02258772,6.470029e-7,0.0001451021,0.4857962,0.4708543,0.0003869663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9456412,0.0008965092,0.00005945573,0.008072422,0.0003724571,0.0001459376,0.000004374164,0.0000338168,0.04477378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849737,0.000954033,0.000062709,0.0003050742,0.0003580387,0.000004062415,1.730862e-7,0.0000096565,0.01333261],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4944147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9702489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0294615624395419,"score_gpt":0.3028856343199668,"score_spread":0.2734240718804249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}