{"id":"W1544109115","doi":"10.1108/02656710510577224","title":"Object‐oriented software development antecedents that influence product bug density","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Originality; Software quality; Product (mathematics); Software engineering; Software; Software development; Suite; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); New product development; Process management; Engineering; Psychology; Marketing; Business; Mathematics; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003960044,0.0002337411,0.0003067877,0.0004129426,0.0001025777,0.0002549473,0.002685671,0.00005228047,0.00002571929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002234845,0.0002166366,0.000167515,0.0003629002,0.00008368336,0.00119864,0.001163158,0.0004071085,0.00007481677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00112631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001847582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004630066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000163366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950091,0.0002073054,0.001060859,0.0005272426,0.002809097,0.0003864218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964612,0.0004554011,0.0004751644,0.0007785196,0.001631901,0.0001977755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002656571,0.001646064,0.7197252,0.0003010826,0.0009266078,0.0002972462,0.003005985,0.01784618,0.0003251982,0.003612932,0.00167192,0.2503759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008141414,0.00005536884,0.964645,0.0001789749,0.00001150637,0.00006805441,0.00005947538,0.0003157462,0.007174463,0.0007359755,0.02564741,0.000293883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6893062,0.00007356275,0.3066047,0.002628569,0.0009718801,0.0002342682,0.000002010232,0.0001195756,0.00005918703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8455365,0.00004801867,0.1536793,0.0003492167,0.0001398356,0.00001178209,0.000002730566,0.0000113798,0.0002211993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.250082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8834184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02277272355202363,"score_gpt":0.3220412297818265,"score_spread":0.2992685062298028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}