{"id":"W1544109115","doi":"10.1108/02656710510577224","title":"Object‐oriented software development antecedents that influence product bug density","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Originality; Software quality; Product (mathematics); Software engineering; Software; Software development; Suite; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); New product development; Process management; Engineering; Psychology; Marketing; Business; Mathematics; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00307417,0.0002964513,0.0002759579,0.001765043,0.0006138614,0.001722341,0.000445567,0.0005281417,0.005936529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04885804,0.0004205876,0.0003301134,0.0010001,0.00094236,0.0008086363,0.001253568,0.001139845,0.0003085071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000934094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001754389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004301997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005051054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971602,0.00122978,0.0002039097,0.0003167735,0.0008569435,0.0002324763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9058697,0.06315205,0.01873766,0.002711867,0.00484135,0.004687401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001022362,0.0004394662,0.9855428,0.00005383379,0.00004812628,0.0001585623,0.000890922,0.0005247354,0.0006263633,0.001140584,0.0001717529,0.01030064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001359637,0.0001668799,0.9949433,0.00005438617,0.0000682227,0.0001135323,0.001035821,0.001948257,0.0004215153,0.0006991905,0.0005267095,0.000008569737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967097,0.0001393698,0.0008278251,0.0001617256,0.000005275676,0.00002922721,0.00003453301,0.00001677251,0.002075674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989954,0.00006916023,0.0006051454,0.00001196799,0.000003182703,0.0000123686,0.00003186106,0.00000542078,0.0002654533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005936529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01985967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02277272355202363,"score_gpt":0.3220412297818265,"score_spread":0.2992685062298028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}