{"id":"W1544132179","doi":"","title":"Reconsidering Res Judicata: A Comparative Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Res judicata; Scope (computer science); Doctrine; Law; Adversary; Political science; Action (physics); Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Computer science; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007542265,0.0001423962,0.0004301477,0.0001528632,0.0003758909,0.0001210006,0.0005201025,0.00006276739,0.0006370611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001353351,0.0001230519,0.0001634475,0.0001948838,0.0005934883,0.001056131,0.00004986016,0.0003096375,0.00006700416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003043232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003266842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003624707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006595315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981098,0.0002661495,0.0005767279,0.0001663172,0.0006697603,0.0002112884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967309,0.000240178,0.0007434255,0.00008099315,0.002044062,0.0001604109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000159575,0.0001129556,0.0005525336,0.000002106219,0.0002331119,0.00002284219,0.1153116,0.00001019461,0.0001428561,0.881342,0.002080568,0.00002961073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007560106,0.0003076408,0.001952032,0.0002229368,0.00005144505,0.0000601739,0.1028922,0.00002353521,0.005838765,0.09310542,0.7944976,0.0002921686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08743487,0.0007261143,0.0004400399,0.001159226,0.001183446,0.0001341276,0.00001022274,0.00001994792,0.908892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971203,0.00006346333,0.0008681355,0.0002221189,0.000969458,0.000005122346,9.642333e-7,0.000006633129,0.000743796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9096854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6975372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.25700860748035,"score_gpt":0.3939149846991725,"score_spread":0.1369063772188225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}