{"id":"W1544197200","doi":"","title":"Anchoring the Law in a Bed of Principle: A Critique of, and Proposal to Improve, Canadian and American Hearsay and Confrontation Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Jurisprudence; Confrontation Clause; Admissible evidence; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Political science; Common law; Sociology; History","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04163579,0.0008897752,0.001557377,0.008129521,0.02319304,0.02294741,0.008698398,0.01863693,0.003419638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05659211,0.0008198426,0.001686569,0.006801418,0.1006852,0.01302118,0.007009767,0.02381768,0.0005785035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0810883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1831452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7691718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7830913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9471324,0.01254534,0.001707322,0.003898847,0.03031841,0.004397649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9638142,0.01795204,0.001318815,0.001555772,0.01381142,0.001547794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000420065,0.000005200395,0.00008156335,0.00004460965,0.000003629837,0.00003973049,0.002066058,0.00009345427,0.00002684423,0.9873461,0.004677527,0.005611055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004260099,0.00002353424,0.001034445,0.0008731561,0.00004909632,0.0001268643,0.005142813,0.001115428,0.000238591,0.7625837,0.2286699,0.00009981579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007768731,0.02449385,0.03788372,0.6920806,0.003272775,0.0001344883,0.0001253423,0.0001661466,0.2340744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7320892,0.01600049,0.04615758,0.1572572,0.003765114,0.0003771579,0.0001298584,0.0002110987,0.04401231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2308282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5883396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05538563774118799,"score_gpt":0.3946579378165523,"score_spread":0.3392723000753643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}