{"id":"W1545254499","doi":"10.1177/160940690600500308","title":"The Qualitative Research Interview: Participants' Responsive Participation in Knowledge Making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Reflexivity; Psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Focus group; Ideal (ethics); Style (visual arts); Semi-structured interview; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06856687,0.0009575197,0.0008480226,0.001706724,0.006861552,0.006262111,0.002851512,0.002819951,0.007112419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06920315,0.0009355342,0.0006809215,0.002634836,0.01231771,0.005840927,0.00841065,0.003757962,0.002090638],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004024752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01000232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001915723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002725338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9385306,0.05387571,0.001187675,0.001854732,0.003102318,0.001448957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9154345,0.06730866,0.002907773,0.004264156,0.007195167,0.002889791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001815728,0.00006643486,0.0005809165,0.0005440299,0.000008563102,0.0003490688,0.9477755,0.0001395707,0.00441042,0.01602991,0.004380167,0.02553371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000258512,0.0005155431,0.00175074,0.002146694,0.00004035566,0.001031754,0.7261887,0.001425032,0.007506514,0.03366467,0.2252987,0.0001727576],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3506098,0.001678726,0.4659075,0.02974645,0.001732544,0.02504356,0.002671792,0.00125873,0.1213509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7563236,0.001184448,0.1908572,0.003523116,0.0001749659,0.02459629,0.0005610574,0.000240644,0.02253854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9314331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3626206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8522214493485023,"score_gpt":0.740003463279192,"score_spread":0.1122179860693103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}