{"id":"W1545596551","doi":"10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05910.x","title":"Ecological economics of soil erosion: a review of the current state of knowledge","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment, and Health","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Land degradation; Strengths and weaknesses; Ecosystem services; Land use; Land management; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Ecological economics; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Economics; Ecology; Sustainability","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001270817,0.001056184,0.002409297,0.003890762,0.0003251316,0.00156219,0.00109947,0.001318864,0.003195109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002287204,0.0004728826,0.0006648701,0.007350129,0.0007126287,0.002316856,0.0007243545,0.001135295,0.001137335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009810686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002201868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003230409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004862607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996506,0.00006804637,0.0000574967,0.00007470445,0.000124859,0.00002434187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983366,0.001107036,0.0001833345,0.0000273293,0.0002783832,0.00006744247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006429984,0.00007668628,0.0005063626,0.04124841,0.0001676334,0.0001644002,0.000129025,0.0009371306,0.0005427044,0.004697922,0.02115197,0.9303134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002578909,0.0001675387,0.004809062,0.03760071,0.0004747674,0.001439368,0.0003690321,0.0004246146,0.0003966247,0.009549225,0.9446746,0.00006866854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001197811,0.9990731,0.00008376722,0.0002048765,0.00004838025,0.000002007203,0.00001390286,0.000001857022,0.0004522022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004788957,0.9992307,0.00009754832,0.00005347073,0.00005462908,0.000001978897,0.000009821822,5.242571e-7,0.0000724089],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003890762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01068872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1625006144154796,"score_gpt":0.3550515700593814,"score_spread":0.1925509556439018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}