{"id":"W1548652524","doi":"10.1109/eurcon.2001.938166","title":"Analysis of end-to-end delay based on enhanced-EFCI congestion control algorithm for ABR service","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EUROCON'2001. International Conference on Trends in Communications. Technical Program, Proceedings (Cat. No.01EX439)","topic":"Network Traffic and Congestion Control","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Network congestion; Computer science; Computer network; Flow control (data); Service (business); End-to-end principle; Algorithm; Asynchronous Transfer Mode; Quality of service; Real-time computing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001312749,0.0006363631,0.0003641946,0.001093603,0.000323439,0.0007179357,0.001224756,0.0005254211,0.001447651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004705797,0.0002145338,0.0002973362,0.0005574957,0.000433399,0.001061732,0.0003240652,0.0008474838,0.0001622104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001407755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009472719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004749282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002757634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988996,0.0001431476,0.00004207961,0.0001545848,0.0006205322,0.0001400807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977722,0.001035027,0.000186108,0.0001238223,0.0008381183,0.00004478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004269024,0.0000937052,0.003423266,0.000144201,0.00005198676,0.0001892832,0.0001247715,0.8696619,0.02820366,0.04077076,0.001178242,0.05573138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004440632,0.00002190962,0.0003675167,0.000003103841,0.000004780569,0.00002692291,0.000003679475,0.9966171,0.001899932,0.0008275153,0.0002164177,0.000006713747],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1316885,0.001422391,0.8585178,0.0001697913,0.000108524,0.00009152923,0.0001053092,0.000624684,0.007271501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9453325,0.0004494411,0.05231376,0.00004697584,0.00003112289,0.00006061578,0.0001055152,0.00004692274,0.001613231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004749282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01021403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06242097611086476,"score_gpt":0.3341069017253538,"score_spread":0.2716859256144891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}