{"id":"W1548652524","doi":"10.1109/eurcon.2001.938166","title":"Analysis of end-to-end delay based on enhanced-EFCI congestion control algorithm for ABR service","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EUROCON'2001. International Conference on Trends in Communications. Technical Program, Proceedings (Cat. No.01EX439)","topic":"Network Traffic and Congestion Control","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Network congestion; Computer science; Computer network; Flow control (data); Service (business); End-to-end principle; Algorithm; Asynchronous Transfer Mode; Quality of service; Real-time computing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001278311,0.0006009236,0.0008905111,0.001921358,0.000304225,0.000432905,0.005391145,0.0003445814,0.000613566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005759306,0.0006214716,0.0003875469,0.003474527,0.0002976518,0.0004921549,0.000439396,0.0006888923,0.0001138844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003838069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001064339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000526278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002676114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952685,0.0001658508,0.001419718,0.001272063,0.00107768,0.0007961371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935143,0.001119423,0.0008022132,0.001612264,0.002592614,0.0003592104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001775449,0.002149421,0.000248962,0.00001804611,0.0002959584,0.000002345968,0.0001412238,0.002387767,0.001369764,0.03487567,0.001123136,0.9572102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002199132,0.001241806,0.001494534,0.000205337,0.0002108755,0.000005007689,0.00002546471,0.98658,0.0001371637,0.0004637691,0.006864199,0.0005726687],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007019231,0.00007347528,0.8507072,0.05990877,0.0009377052,0.004607926,0.0004117835,0.00224119,0.07409269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7715351,0.0001230922,0.2232537,0.002271535,0.0001042202,0.002151484,0.0001905745,0.00004081743,0.0003294541],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06242097611086476,"score_gpt":0.3341069017253538,"score_spread":0.2716859256144891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}