{"id":"W1548764173","doi":"10.1108/00242530910942081","title":"Untangling the relationship between libraries, young adults and Web 2.0","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Originality; Scholarship; Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); World Wide Web; Web 2.0; Information science; Computer science; Scholarly communication; Webometrics; Sociology; Library science; Knowledge management; The Internet; Publishing; Social science; Political science; Qualitative research","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001524309,0.0001573692,0.0002361245,0.000042644,0.0002188231,0.0004728606,0.001106817,0.00005128305,0.00004407352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003181859,0.0001021074,0.00006400076,0.0007501189,0.00003154107,0.006531188,0.0002614653,0.0002091685,0.0000501074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001908556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006897504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001767864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.309208e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988262,0.0001749473,0.000310556,0.0003170383,0.0001590351,0.0002122437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987574,0.0004042643,0.0001126435,0.0006088003,0.000006025372,0.0001109156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003174553,0.00001273775,0.3621703,0.0006803483,0.000009404968,0.00001132732,0.0002894509,2.292571e-7,7.02198e-7,0.5672069,0.01188476,0.0577306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001949529,0.00008008664,0.6037726,0.003284641,0.00002713021,0.00002781111,0.0000134397,0.0004614022,0.00001765821,0.04197088,0.3498605,0.0002888815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03076333,0.7692831,0.0007151084,0.145477,0.0002736462,0.000923607,0.00001587609,0.001079642,0.05146876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8944714,0.04861873,0.01594563,0.03828153,0.0005934427,0.00001974769,0.0000755805,0.00002735525,0.001966603],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8637081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4734953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02594580180837676,"score_gpt":0.234502853105234,"score_spread":0.2085570512968573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}