{"id":"W1549480545","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2011.537584","title":"Is Insanity a Demeaning Defense? Examining the Ethics of Offender Pathologization through the Lens of the Classics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Insanity; Punishment (psychology); HAMLET (protein complex); Insanity defense; Face (sociological concept); Economic Justice; Psychology; Criminology; Physiognomy; Psychoanalysis; Criminal justice; Law; Sociology; Literature; Social psychology; Art; Political science; Psychiatry; Social science; Anthropology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005758946,0.000100981,0.0002115833,0.0000075858,0.0008144448,0.00001770021,0.0005977707,0.0003803053,0.00004401941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006130457,0.000047038,0.0001896763,0.0004222893,0.002011226,0.0005648646,0.00007034401,0.001607081,0.000001670847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003157904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000257747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001329811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001944615,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961582,0.002407927,0.000518213,0.000117059,0.0005981901,0.000200428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943857,0.00214985,0.002115458,0.0003342722,0.0009900527,0.00002465472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001646663,0.0002167841,0.005939336,0.00001356075,0.0003031723,0.000006679716,0.8072692,0.0000142722,0.0004257129,0.1610344,0.02277854,0.001833702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001136509,0.0006135715,0.07009022,0.0001938352,0.001077462,0.0006022283,0.4576209,0.000007589293,0.001097974,0.1373335,0.3299761,0.0002500169],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4073761,0.002315885,0.007396883,0.1542781,0.00569518,0.0005761026,0.00001163896,0.0000264133,0.4223237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785742,0.00183021,0.004395462,0.01485735,0.0002428126,0.000001414789,1.650905e-7,0.000008255767,0.0000901069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5711981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7410448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2772349249450676,"score_gpt":0.4145125541412853,"score_spread":0.1372776291962177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}