{"id":"W1549495137","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.286132","title":"Haberler versus Nurkse: The Case for Floating Exchange Rates as an Alternative to Bretton Woods?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Keynesian economics; Prosperity; League; Exchange rate; Interwar period; Floating exchange rate; Great Depression; Fixed exchange rates; Currency; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Economic history; Monetary economics; World War II; Political science; Law; Physics; Economic growth","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004792224,0.0006493135,0.001359919,0.0009838678,0.002331118,0.006971645,0.002022832,0.01201646,0.02434737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0191776,0.0002804558,0.000775173,0.0009850416,0.009031765,0.01656451,0.002039956,0.008418791,0.00186482],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001328728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001391428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004210005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004642681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984713,0.000546844,0.00007272635,0.0003873339,0.0002250242,0.0002966851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964715,0.001656372,0.0006463496,0.0005480624,0.0003493178,0.0003284126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007417873,0.00000754132,0.0001489886,0.00001810494,0.00000829345,0.00005740348,0.000165143,0.0001509462,0.00003173933,0.9880115,0.005389063,0.005937146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006834682,0.00002236882,0.0003469108,0.000116989,0.00002188583,0.00007380511,0.0004512141,0.0008084637,0.00009212302,0.9730113,0.02496319,0.00002340417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1056809,0.02162694,0.0307009,0.471085,0.004710157,0.00004870391,0.0003529637,0.0002070568,0.3655874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341504,0.005305933,0.005364931,0.02016647,0.003601759,0.00005137598,0.00005829884,0.000189936,0.0311109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02434737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08145005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03514042078726066,"score_gpt":0.2943887267722705,"score_spread":0.2592483059850099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}