{"id":"W1549676996","doi":"10.1111/risa.12283","title":"Risk Analysis of Dust Explosion Scenarios Using Bayesian Networks","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bayesian network; Dust explosion; Fault tree analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Risk assessment; Environmental science; Forensic engineering; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Computer security; Waste management; Machine learning; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005625219,0.001635422,0.001384182,0.004064009,0.0006941977,0.002108693,0.001907608,0.001691542,0.002330056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01498531,0.0009546207,0.001820693,0.001732437,0.0009593506,0.0034153,0.001605485,0.00151163,0.0002255094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001758903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001373732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005990824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003997247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968165,0.001532736,0.000163736,0.0005332414,0.000751172,0.0002026752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917408,0.006455728,0.0008891334,0.0001684048,0.0005854092,0.0001604194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004020871,0.00002432081,0.001690287,0.00006372827,0.00008262803,0.0001211788,0.00005317186,0.970266,0.0003246615,0.01422904,0.0002134435,0.01289118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005406041,0.00001781929,0.0002885492,0.00001769816,0.00002495124,0.00004288651,0.00001723741,0.9848977,0.0001492204,0.01421474,0.0003113118,0.00001263442],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01647205,0.0003307385,0.9814063,0.0001863865,0.0000160234,0.00007539298,0.0001186704,0.0001240435,0.001270409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7628623,0.001618292,0.2318488,0.0001053347,0.0001048012,0.0004808726,0.0005816476,0.00006304117,0.002334944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005990824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02974933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04246552942689796,"score_gpt":0.3352381910509487,"score_spread":0.2927726616240507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}