{"id":"W1550351995","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01287.x","title":"The <i>British Journal of Sociology</i> in the 1980s: a decade of eclecticism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Eclecticism; Schism; Sociology; Aside; Social science; Mainstream; Scholarship; Epistemology; Law; Politics; History; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02207884,0.0007748558,0.001537221,0.01261948,0.006581854,0.03010484,0.001541948,0.005904026,0.004583133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03435548,0.0008130292,0.0006050501,0.01623792,0.02871338,0.01540838,0.006358061,0.01054846,0.002554874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02181256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0229199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0177456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02207808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9765282,0.01007486,0.001890908,0.001511514,0.008787115,0.001207432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9463595,0.03128355,0.003119026,0.002256837,0.01245558,0.004525611],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001160832,0.00009256723,0.001539905,0.002668803,0.00005165454,0.0003356186,0.03541112,0.0001047457,0.000692184,0.4154723,0.4111529,0.1323622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001001144,0.00001485569,0.001237334,0.002997288,0.000006122358,0.0001122989,0.005570568,0.00003830253,0.00006860238,0.03113381,0.9587911,0.00001971854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00402283,0.5500892,0.001849753,0.3541936,0.03412116,0.00003960171,0.0001378014,0.00005174453,0.05549433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1678649,0.5264068,0.007187288,0.1579085,0.06041286,0.0004025116,0.0004634953,0.0004692585,0.07888446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.158262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01382449701512099,"score_gpt":0.2961252614715637,"score_spread":0.2823007644564427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}