{"id":"W1550736712","doi":"10.18438/b8v90m","title":"Evaluating Qualitative Research Studies for Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Critical appraisal; Relevance (law); Computer science; Process (computing); Narrative; Management science; Systematic review; Qualitative property; Engineering ethics; Data science; Psychology; Sociology; MEDLINE; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Social science; Engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.604328,0.002109465,0.0042763,0.01738754,0.006051969,0.01654501,0.004789734,0.005096582,0.01903454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.733087,0.002014719,0.005124874,0.01635322,0.007513233,0.01210966,0.007566051,0.003298498,0.002527041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01776862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04696107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002729972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005319227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2590689,0.6268064,0.07169659,0.00436325,0.03607639,0.001988446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1118632,0.7457675,0.03334949,0.02482813,0.08189077,0.002300989],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002223856,0.00137026,0.01781793,0.183456,0.002774809,0.001159062,0.1165922,0.006187454,0.003941039,0.1202044,0.01691969,0.5273533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003696527,0.006651037,0.01409883,0.3290119,0.005466877,0.00107646,0.1900647,0.01292725,0.01150145,0.1550716,0.2695517,0.0008818175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0576405,0.03354353,0.6143572,0.02601864,0.006187529,0.2073647,0.004150464,0.0007286205,0.05000877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1203409,0.009479566,0.7604686,0.002263129,0.0003676591,0.1052258,0.0006263368,0.0001201891,0.001107944],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.395672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4879341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1983503887858916,"score_gpt":0.5217509969449249,"score_spread":0.3234006081590333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}