{"id":"W1551292152","doi":"","title":"Almost transferable utility, changes in production possibilities, and the Nash Bargaining and the Kalai-Smorodinsky Solutions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Allocative efficiency; Transferable utility; Economics; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Cardinality (data modeling); Distribution (mathematics); Game theory; Mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02778216,0.0003041418,0.0009051432,0.0005556215,0.000507312,0.0003038397,0.0005203948,0.0003678238,0.00005468983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015215,0.0002512099,0.0001201907,0.0002206239,0.001895686,0.0001379965,0.0006356559,0.001807003,0.000007300087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003802734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001379134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001712912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005856058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962593,0.0006248212,0.00109116,0.001104927,0.00007998238,0.0008397839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971427,0.001482292,0.0002761312,0.000951527,0.00005277595,0.00009460308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001853789,0.0002359996,0.06798536,0.0007454138,0.0002847828,0.00001132774,0.02716236,0.002162248,0.0000112895,0.8346515,0.00006219842,0.0648337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01053832,0.0001724255,0.04262777,0.0009845521,0.000031538,0.000103012,0.01846389,0.05861668,0.00007460418,0.850961,0.01606369,0.001362468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8833292,0.006387687,0.00001467087,0.004751081,0.0007412477,0.002317206,0.0001281002,0.00003438909,0.1022965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791884,0.01736284,0.0000536259,0.00009523621,0.0002720235,0.000327718,0.00001844186,0.00004091319,0.002640732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09965573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07820212990443214,"score_gpt":0.2898430350371742,"score_spread":0.2116409051327421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}