{"id":"W1553020772","doi":"10.1108/13665621011012898","title":"Re‐thinking the “thing”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Workplace Learning","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":224,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Sociology; Epistemology; Actor–network theory; Originality; Agency (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Activity theory; Context (archaeology); Generative grammar; Organizational theory; Structure and agency; Knowledge management; Computer science; Social science; Pedagogy; Management; Qualitative research","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009580513,0.00006678627,0.0001103767,0.0001064723,0.001704781,0.000348996,0.0004227326,0.00008753623,0.001370667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009342079,0.00004598123,0.00007059283,0.0004845773,0.0001854221,0.0005074703,0.00002513669,0.00297131,0.00005609311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000383132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003414814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008605831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002106757,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981313,0.0007540312,0.0002774933,0.00007289246,0.0005573205,0.0002069141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970879,0.001430088,0.0008944129,0.00008775086,0.0004318343,0.00006803337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001152234,0.0001110837,0.1619815,0.00001109945,0.0001125194,0.00002721265,0.6378566,0.001444675,0.001588587,0.1078772,0.03366777,0.05520657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009720754,0.00002777621,0.003303223,0.00003332896,0.00001187066,0.00001019876,0.09805844,0.00001496224,0.00003156243,0.0005843334,0.8977671,0.00005999401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6731135,0.0001897958,0.001134063,0.1303606,0.005848556,0.00009136757,4.133656e-8,0.00005196472,0.1892101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790155,0.00003616037,0.002478496,0.000825882,0.00231347,6.889156e-7,1.436848e-7,0.000009968906,0.01531972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8640993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04034416589599508,"score_gpt":0.3903543390651343,"score_spread":0.3500101731691392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}