{"id":"W1553180238","doi":"10.1002/9781118144527.ch17","title":"Performance of a Carbon Steel Container in a Canadian Used Nuclear Fuel Deep Geological Repository","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Ceramic transactions /Ceramic transactions","topic":"Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Nuclear Waste Management Organization","funders":"","keywords":"Container (type theory); Materials science; Spent nuclear fuel; Corrosion; Carbon fibers; Carbon steel; Metallurgy; Nuclear engineering; Radioactive waste; Forensic engineering; Waste management; Engineering; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002368801,0.0006828681,0.00103542,0.002225849,0.0003270232,0.00004394693,0.000669291,0.001262705,0.006124432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009872175,0.0007283925,0.0003328871,0.0008849823,0.0009768623,0.0001573457,0.000007513627,0.001122477,0.0001717635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006451402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003905851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.160751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4436235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964787,0.0001988748,0.0009666237,0.0009626077,0.0003635605,0.001029667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981931,0.00007960849,0.0003882323,0.0009553925,0.00008523123,0.0002984256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004253071,0.01888949,0.05022884,0.01219426,0.01147669,0.001788555,0.09246454,0.04321797,0.6489329,0.008759766,0.01877241,0.08902148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02459028,0.004310716,0.2026398,0.003912246,0.005990429,0.002785147,0.01443013,0.06187708,0.01144897,0.0008455502,0.6517013,0.01546845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.699709,0.002990949,0.002960121,0.0005442282,0.004649845,0.003309744,0.001361594,0.003002637,0.2814719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712421,0.0009903702,0.0005708406,0.00006493091,0.00005833433,0.0001572497,0.00001982949,0.0004372326,0.02645915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.637484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01090092751097565,"score_gpt":0.2028695278726138,"score_spread":0.1919686003616381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}