{"id":"W1554888927","doi":"10.1093/library/11.4.481","title":"<i>Abstractions of Evidence in the Study of Manuscripts and Early Printed Books</i> . By J <scp>oseph</scp> A. D <scp>ane</scp> . <i>Abstractions of Evidence in the Study of Manuscripts and Early Printed Books</i> . By DaneJoseph A.. Farnham: Ashgate. 2009. viii + 176 pp. £55. <scp>isbn</scp> 978 0 7546 6501 4.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Nominalism; Mythology; Skepticism; Philosophy; Assertion; Order (exchange); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Framing (construction); Literature; History; Art; Theology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007534237,0.001059776,0.0008406639,0.007369236,0.003504863,0.01777649,0.001826113,0.003823167,0.01757921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02089913,0.001567186,0.0005235111,0.01195095,0.01954361,0.02459631,0.004983658,0.005636379,0.0035202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007256145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006674553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01133725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02681167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935685,0.003477882,0.0004984352,0.0004786374,0.001735833,0.0002407782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676637,0.02795349,0.001495252,0.0008566318,0.001454728,0.0005762334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007734181,0.00005835228,0.001460132,0.003763715,0.00006721048,0.0003667705,0.02722058,0.0001832313,0.0003793438,0.3715461,0.4270416,0.1678357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001110153,0.00002127973,0.00419778,0.006095758,0.00001825064,0.0002936843,0.01532997,0.00007372269,0.0002055284,0.15011,0.8236121,0.00003085554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001427985,0.82332,0.00267505,0.08229556,0.003382135,0.00003894332,0.0004163365,0.00005631305,0.08638772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1223391,0.6869338,0.009953381,0.01572907,0.008784181,0.0003817181,0.0009264336,0.0003933068,0.154559],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01777649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05880839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07133283766266232,"score_gpt":0.2884795042899542,"score_spread":0.2171466666272918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}