{"id":"W1554888927","doi":"10.1093/library/11.4.481","title":"<i>Abstractions of Evidence in the Study of Manuscripts and Early Printed Books</i> . By J <scp>oseph</scp> A. D <scp>ane</scp> . <i>Abstractions of Evidence in the Study of Manuscripts and Early Printed Books</i> . By DaneJoseph A.. Farnham: Ashgate. 2009. viii + 176 pp. £55. <scp>isbn</scp> 978 0 7546 6501 4.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Nominalism; Mythology; Skepticism; Philosophy; Assertion; Order (exchange); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Framing (construction); Literature; History; Art; Theology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00264678,0.0006167697,0.00110591,0.0003138483,0.0008873136,0.000240675,0.002149436,0.0002911041,0.00001746404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001769084,0.0003745947,0.0002009263,0.001404373,0.001724376,0.002772424,0.0005695585,0.001692247,0.00001129417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004701181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002045696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01450215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002801997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926952,0.002107036,0.001817099,0.000907986,0.001614159,0.0008585746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884248,0.008614753,0.001316281,0.001170903,0.0002436069,0.0002296512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009290632,0.006867277,0.3377795,0.0003007372,0.0004014574,0.00006119689,0.5226567,0.00001302192,0.04446276,0.0009484983,0.08539931,0.00101665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001396973,0.00187035,0.69436,0.0004613597,0.0003001652,0.00001723764,0.1694455,0.000007650136,0.003121578,0.000884832,0.1279728,0.0001616299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800813,0.007849461,0.000002949992,0.0008814917,0.0004234163,0.003248668,0.0001535409,0.00008699288,0.007272212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892613,0.002165423,0.00004900934,0.0002630726,0.0001275729,0.0002570757,0.000006691198,0.00004977519,0.007820081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3565805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07133283766266232,"score_gpt":0.2884795042899542,"score_spread":0.2171466666272918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}