{"id":"W1554901441","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00105.x","title":"Estimating abundance from presence/absence maps","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Council","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Relative abundance distribution; Macroecology; Poisson distribution; Statistics; Spatial analysis; Negative binomial distribution; Species distribution; Data set; Population; Count data; Ecology; Occupancy; Relative species abundance; Mathematics; Biology; Species richness; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000776171,0.00007915534,0.0001284481,0.00003152491,0.0001878517,0.000003000053,0.00009687016,0.0001183754,0.0003483023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003885772,0.00007831456,0.00001410088,0.0001155526,0.0004121732,0.000165283,0.000145129,0.0001494319,0.00006838807],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008550776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005014988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005354406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004160998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990118,0.00031859,0.0001746199,0.0002616756,0.00003837534,0.0001949712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994091,0.0003832445,0.00007396691,0.0001002256,0.000005266706,0.00002820256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001319793,0.00003414083,0.9919177,0.000002581368,0.000005315094,0.000003003083,0.00151302,0.0007791562,0.0003711761,0.001241038,0.00003948352,0.004080202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001176561,0.00003294821,0.8033527,0.000004371735,0.000005082474,0.000003010184,0.0001086172,0.04727583,0.00004691322,0.1489491,0.00003587088,0.00006786244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8226439,0.0001169705,0.1693827,0.00008540165,0.0005239197,0.0001030987,0.000001925697,0.00002451592,0.007117555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5527095,0.00001302666,0.4470796,0.00005363202,0.0000098989,0.00002249501,0.000001112366,0.000002170608,0.0001084983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2776969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3813666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02849762891266646,"score_gpt":0.316145317127747,"score_spread":0.2876476882150806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}