{"id":"W1556448281","doi":"10.2172/1048266","title":"Leakage Risk Assessment for a Potential CO<sub>2</sub> Storage Project in Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Leakage (economics); Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Risk assessment; Aquifer; Carbon leakage; Risk analysis (engineering); Waste management; Environmental engineering; Petroleum engineering; Engineering; Carbon dioxide; Greenhouse gas; Business; Groundwater; Geology; Computer science; Computer security; Geotechnical engineering; Emissions trading; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001487898,0.0006588048,0.0003002423,0.001915923,0.001295059,0.002021817,0.0008611969,0.0006957677,0.001671252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00189224,0.0003114651,0.0005638244,0.00218406,0.001053056,0.0007669609,0.001249993,0.0005215337,0.0001733576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02228615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01734244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7668301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8494412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989198,0.0001642132,0.00004334747,0.00008945228,0.0005444627,0.0002386832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982678,0.0003500553,0.0002782322,0.00006709188,0.0009166014,0.0001202919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007005599,0.0001455007,0.2208041,0.0002341046,0.0002322768,0.004038226,0.000922393,0.676293,0.01393782,0.01200825,0.00354228,0.0671415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001133995,0.0008245049,0.3171403,0.0003357951,0.0003716403,0.001242458,0.009387419,0.6259552,0.02324872,0.00679311,0.01436942,0.0002181181],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.966107,0.000257137,0.01256168,0.0003647431,0.000008134592,0.0003598176,0.001358798,0.0001360031,0.0188467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916905,0.0002288517,0.002359097,0.00004219715,8.341946e-7,0.00005180655,0.0005299736,0.0000167305,0.005079919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2331699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4690861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02383934138423582,"score_gpt":0.2915875762526078,"score_spread":0.267748234868372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}