{"id":"W1556448281","doi":"10.2172/1048266","title":"Leakage Risk Assessment for a Potential CO<sub>2</sub> Storage Project in Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Leakage (economics); Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Risk assessment; Aquifer; Carbon leakage; Risk analysis (engineering); Waste management; Environmental engineering; Petroleum engineering; Engineering; Carbon dioxide; Greenhouse gas; Business; Groundwater; Geology; Computer science; Computer security; Geotechnical engineering; Emissions trading; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001098856,0.0005440446,0.0006016126,0.0001620055,0.0002945601,0.00009298651,0.000427184,0.0004377874,0.008549244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001207178,0.0004845287,0.000263254,0.000250742,0.0001509868,0.0002571482,0.0002085692,0.0007968422,0.00009961843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003557744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00475961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8150977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960302,0.0002079905,0.0008998804,0.0009773362,0.001183092,0.0007015199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983192,0.0001226507,0.0006546826,0.0006126513,0.0001103686,0.0001804324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008868321,0.0005381611,0.005566415,0.0001117875,0.0001569771,0.0003577596,0.0004604646,0.0009157594,0.004457097,0.00008169313,0.9718097,0.01545546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007745333,0.0003454999,0.04524493,0.00006959753,0.0001655669,0.0001593971,0.001110924,0.001484067,0.001092601,0.0002393138,0.9482154,0.001098208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1094357,0.0001116918,0.00913876,0.0004553504,0.004334732,0.005948938,0.001202613,0.0002227094,0.8691495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8638871,0.0005090299,0.002557342,0.0003722106,0.0003004851,0.001147596,0.0008708763,0.00007785724,0.1302775],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7544514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02383934138423582,"score_gpt":0.2915875762526078,"score_spread":0.267748234868372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}