{"id":"W1556453357","doi":"10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09212.x","title":"Evaluation of fluorodeoxyglucose positron‐emission tomography with computed tomography for staging of urothelial carcinoma","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Urology","topic":"Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Hôtel-Dieu de Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Positron emission tomography; Computed tomography; Nuclear medicine; Medicine; Fluorodeoxyglucose; Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography; Urothelial carcinoma; Radiology; Positron emission; Tomography; Cancer; Bladder cancer; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001914507,0.0006356909,0.0004699066,0.001223308,0.0002600347,0.000656152,0.0004440829,0.0007791095,0.001378364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00677564,0.0002395352,0.0003651562,0.0006225886,0.0003385483,0.0005270163,0.0003127413,0.000310867,0.0004143532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003428019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003631692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001176807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002285109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990032,0.0004641768,0.0001143887,0.00012189,0.0001917375,0.0001044939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977047,0.0008982377,0.0005105609,0.00008075836,0.0004163075,0.000389432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002555949,0.00004494581,0.9942674,0.00002302096,0.00002497737,0.0004863605,0.00002730746,0.00007366259,0.001384022,0.000005428719,0.00005014431,0.003357278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005964714,0.0008495369,0.9894133,0.00003069862,0.00009219696,0.005865451,0.000118069,0.001483013,0.001471798,0.00001316022,0.000593379,0.000009780814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969042,0.001825839,0.0002529412,0.00007318617,0.00001547209,0.00004004535,0.00008623955,0.000008543997,0.0007935273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991009,0.0002570004,0.0003977836,0.00003084797,0.00002060631,0.00001728082,0.00009113484,0.000001733982,0.00008273339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001914507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01012498,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01477868094443591,"score_gpt":0.2737343791142728,"score_spread":0.2589556981698369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}