{"id":"W1556528569","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2006.00048.x","title":"Green Subsidies in Agriculture: Estimating the Adoption Costs of Conservation Tillage from Observed Behavior","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Incentive; Profit (economics); Tillage; Economics; Agriculture; Stochastic game; Order (exchange); Microeconomics; Conservation agriculture; Natural resource economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Business; Agricultural economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Financial economics; Finance; Ecology; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001459249,0.0003143223,0.0002555085,0.0009296395,0.0001383401,0.0004580493,0.0003956287,0.0005846719,0.0009823627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009270453,0.0002925188,0.0003711517,0.0005513892,0.0002746837,0.0005540272,0.0003348757,0.0003465026,0.0001111151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001090473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000697115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02164811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02176511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994707,0.0002312797,0.00003295005,0.0001030224,0.0001209078,0.00004112907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931731,0.00473042,0.001312036,0.000385141,0.0003003533,0.00009895876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003589938,0.0003299096,0.8008648,0.00008135508,0.0001568847,0.00008449045,0.0002075188,0.1487799,0.003377333,0.002068574,0.0001594594,0.04353076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002765283,0.0003332405,0.4746602,0.00002319802,0.00004895313,0.0001254684,0.0001740353,0.5189918,0.002557834,0.002492606,0.0005340462,0.00003099395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785789,0.00005700655,0.02018065,0.00003689134,0.000001837751,0.00006595378,0.0002992655,0.00002476602,0.0007545909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852033,0.00004861446,0.01395734,0.000006653943,0.000001858631,0.000063812,0.0001769394,0.00000263854,0.0005388389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9783519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04304421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07007619670379317,"score_gpt":0.1650401652423709,"score_spread":0.09496396853857772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}