{"id":"W155719043","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2009-0022","title":"SKEW RAY TRACING AND ERROR ANALYSIS OF OPTICAL LENS WITH CYLINDRICAL BOUNDARY SURFACE","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Optical measurement and interference techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Ray tracing (physics); Ray; Position (finance); Optics; Geometrical optics; Ray transfer matrix analysis; Physics; Skew; Normal; Surface (topology); Snell's law; Boundary (topology); Lens (geology); Mathematics; Geometry; Mathematical analysis; Refraction","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002366139,0.0001101641,0.0002569026,0.00006760394,0.0001171787,0.0000346145,0.0003422656,0.00009901397,0.000004972393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002085434,0.00008416591,0.0003678291,0.0006216313,0.00005449611,0.0001741651,0.000006020714,0.0001899996,6.660103e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001038485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001247642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005282266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002218445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999173,0.000007533124,0.000214945,0.000181461,0.0001842857,0.0002387882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999393,0.00007808565,0.00003649611,0.000257527,0.00008397294,0.0001508944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001009386,0.0004871047,0.00009423343,0.000414486,0.005223976,0.000003432261,0.004057239,0.2802145,0.1958488,0.4814534,0.0001546534,0.03194725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003144871,0.0005314418,0.0009549141,0.0001042715,0.0007506422,0.000004087545,0.00006273518,0.9427658,0.05357574,0.0005510745,0.0001283384,0.0002565181],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03834146,0.00003924305,0.9599674,0.00129499,0.00005039136,0.0001710026,0.00001394053,0.0000483718,0.00007317458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8471593,0.000005605035,0.1527451,0.00006681156,0.000004731268,0.000003700269,5.936442e-7,0.000005067703,0.000009151208],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8088178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3432186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02020995270201217,"score_gpt":0.2280012078242508,"score_spread":0.2077912551222386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}