{"id":"W1557870560","doi":"10.11124/01938924-201008180-00001","title":"Utilisation of theoretical models and frameworks in the process of evidence synthesis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"CINAHL; PsycINFO; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Systematic review; Computer science; MEDLINE; Data science; Resource (disambiguation); Management science; Knowledge management; Psychology; Information retrieval; Engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6796411,0.006837474,0.01299273,0.05305272,0.006338807,0.03079587,0.01216675,0.010005,0.01128322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7036666,0.005325518,0.01326426,0.03771761,0.03465965,0.02732452,0.02418616,0.01405678,0.002872491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04320689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08034517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005619668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004400289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1628115,0.7558332,0.04726971,0.00907966,0.02317126,0.001834553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1366118,0.7864403,0.02185377,0.02561088,0.02814746,0.001335778],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003817731,0.0001042501,0.000875052,0.1141998,0.002543275,0.0003204931,0.02630563,0.007497032,0.0003177513,0.6831089,0.007824758,0.1565213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006048156,0.0003095855,0.000472434,0.1609977,0.001960234,0.000270056,0.007242532,0.01236793,0.0006670157,0.7572243,0.05758831,0.00029495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002059211,0.04331943,0.870121,0.03032997,0.002494798,0.03671423,0.001263778,0.0006042779,0.01309327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03379159,0.01459403,0.8676932,0.002667639,0.0003743252,0.07985829,0.0004385434,0.000127676,0.000454639],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3203589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3950596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5890240583027161,"score_gpt":0.5519162876795376,"score_spread":0.03710777062317849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}