{"id":"W1558365818","doi":"10.1103/physrevlett.104.017203","title":"Strong Electromechanical Coupling of an Atomic Force Microscope Cantilever to a Quantum Dot","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review Letters","topic":"Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cantilever; Quantum dot; Physics; Oscillation (cell signaling); Amplitude; Coulomb blockade; Condensed matter physics; Excited state; Coupling (piping); Degeneracy (biology); Atomic physics; Materials science; Voltage; Quantum mechanics; Transistor","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002763852,0.0002791151,0.0002459297,0.000188981,0.0003831619,0.0003203111,0.0006053564,0.0004066322,0.001474107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008136441,0.0002547369,0.0001257696,0.0001081214,0.0006988439,0.0003972364,0.0005264799,0.0004072407,0.0001571095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003515611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001467123,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005125158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008070325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997736,0.00003237164,0.000006225968,0.00006005443,0.0001014992,0.00002632544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999656,0.0002141907,0.00003323894,0.00002604539,0.00002909064,0.00004148576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007982577,0.00006397309,0.00107529,0.00006539129,0.00002320388,0.0004355055,0.0001687526,0.007326524,0.9800385,0.007436186,0.0001052686,0.003181615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000147489,0.0006643586,0.006317895,0.00002624008,0.00003797791,0.0004649372,0.0001556637,0.6360372,0.3471905,0.006732536,0.002169265,0.00005586093],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9715551,0.0001089051,0.02551206,0.0001805169,0.00002798243,0.00002223571,0.00001699713,0.00005006548,0.00252617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959375,0.00004751253,0.003500993,0.00003155629,0.000008882594,0.00001439615,0.000007457074,0.000005860709,0.0004457642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001474107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00493139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009639975523970088,"score_gpt":0.3179950457709326,"score_spread":0.3083550702469625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}