{"id":"W1558380859","doi":"10.4230/dagsemproc.07461.6","title":"Erlangian Approximation to Finite Time Ruin Probabilities in Perturbed Risk Models","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)","topic":"Probability and Risk Models","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Markov process; Mathematics; Risk model; Phase-type distribution; Markov chain; Applied mathematics; Type (biology); First-hitting-time model; Ruin theory; Work (physics); Risk process; Stochastic process; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003355336,0.0008217315,0.001239409,0.001227265,0.0005784935,0.002059485,0.001980181,0.001424236,0.002674122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01708211,0.0005588103,0.0009007423,0.0009833777,0.002278373,0.003318711,0.001367244,0.0022701,0.0003832406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002557504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001369261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007242508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003885932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998096,0.0008900267,0.00006960526,0.0002020058,0.0004594627,0.0002828198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931992,0.004702876,0.0008507179,0.0004560575,0.0005173602,0.0002737785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005414015,0.00003077117,0.0005788734,0.00002676716,0.00002040958,0.0001199857,0.00009503824,0.7499111,0.0004818294,0.2452568,0.000304628,0.003119665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002495238,0.000004348184,0.00005371618,0.000002424178,0.000002148549,0.00001046966,0.000007890727,0.9610987,0.00008692993,0.03863319,0.00009283608,0.000004953597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08274315,0.0005145628,0.9110178,0.0004820505,0.00005640788,0.00003428869,0.00008806993,0.0002173226,0.004846351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518226,0.0005335819,0.03991104,0.0001031469,0.00006364081,0.00006618728,0.00009179331,0.00007912739,0.007328833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007242508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01855606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09017863011510477,"score_gpt":0.3135910623283894,"score_spread":0.2234124322132846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}