{"id":"W1558639712","doi":"10.1002/pds.3485","title":"Evidence of subgroup‐specific treatment effect in the absence of an overall effect: is there really a contradiction?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Subgroup analysis; Medicine; Odds ratio; Treatment effect; Randomization; Sample size determination; Internal medicine; Statistics; Randomized controlled trial; Confidence interval; Mathematics; Traditional medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00412386,0.0002614559,0.000786505,0.00006958182,0.00006527903,0.000004978282,0.0002689197,0.000113011,0.0001501929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008289595,0.0001484237,0.0001051209,0.0001219884,0.000316465,0.0003061546,0.00003747595,0.0002577454,0.000004848238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006071934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000198229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000779574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000459796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957526,0.002820377,0.0006986922,0.0003262847,0.0001206529,0.0002813948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782544,0.02082948,0.0003744459,0.0004131316,0.00006256817,0.00006601923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004643919,0.001423917,0.52214,0.001805205,0.000485091,0.0000554721,0.01352294,0.0001296797,0.104385,0.1400158,0.009011338,0.2023817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004367187,0.004950217,0.3593335,0.001155449,0.0002293784,0.00007076837,0.000250471,0.003725619,0.08759696,0.537032,0.0006471134,0.0006413057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908003,0.003129283,0.002930792,0.001036696,0.0000549383,0.001409677,0.00001532227,0.00006574899,0.0005571966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991011,0.005961315,0.002357833,0.0003476746,0.00003788439,0.0002455141,0.000003714271,0.00001351302,0.00002152718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3970162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6052544,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1010855994430642,"score_gpt":0.4221100691319647,"score_spread":0.3210244696889005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}