{"id":"W1558639712","doi":"10.1002/pds.3485","title":"Evidence of subgroup‐specific treatment effect in the absence of an overall effect: is there really a contradiction?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Subgroup analysis; Medicine; Odds ratio; Treatment effect; Randomization; Sample size determination; Internal medicine; Statistics; Randomized controlled trial; Confidence interval; Mathematics; Traditional medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4194287,0.001960157,0.01339846,0.006971628,0.001715995,0.00713257,0.008712023,0.01342879,0.00826304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7130848,0.001991207,0.02286619,0.00571875,0.01972778,0.01232488,0.005361869,0.008707679,0.001198706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003653761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003041824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001447017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009130469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5181482,0.3246466,0.05412361,0.05754787,0.0420453,0.00348843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1094884,0.8030761,0.03284041,0.0447632,0.008609924,0.001221989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02478471,0.0006626666,0.2129039,0.06605282,0.1972939,0.003778244,0.007408392,0.007379665,0.00201124,0.1241643,0.0244269,0.3291334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009407489,0.005549691,0.09597292,0.02635558,0.1011105,0.006241834,0.003917724,0.02293141,0.004461545,0.6726844,0.05030192,0.001065071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1759869,0.325618,0.2768625,0.168857,0.01824271,0.003121152,0.004736882,0.001742385,0.02483249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8705815,0.01063608,0.05553114,0.05349088,0.006481299,0.001442387,0.0008522472,0.0003444793,0.0006400235],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5805713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7159477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1010855994430642,"score_gpt":0.4221100691319647,"score_spread":0.3210244696889005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}