{"id":"W1558648841","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v6i2.1552","title":"Seeing Double at Memorial University: Two WorldCat Local Usability Studies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; World Wide Web; Pharmacy; Library science; Population; Computer science; Test (biology); Medicine; Human–computer interaction; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02907749,0.0008722861,0.001511822,0.004427182,0.006115256,0.004280291,0.00195049,0.001738192,0.005216564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07347841,0.001371056,0.001000449,0.004160963,0.002717257,0.005974097,0.004830111,0.002141007,0.001849228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005496008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003831402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01976359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05402532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9808483,0.01199729,0.001751304,0.001012004,0.002944029,0.001446966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8693124,0.06863654,0.004880629,0.01508879,0.03649789,0.005583709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004647235,0.02428138,0.1148895,0.002926966,0.0003334738,0.003355329,0.6141352,0.0007017969,0.006449027,0.001260826,0.02237912,0.2046401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001654526,0.02298971,0.3293858,0.001359277,0.0004866573,0.001790478,0.5130596,0.003247992,0.01623269,0.001313922,0.1075575,0.000921841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880453,0.0002083064,0.001653889,0.0004730341,0.00002929895,0.001821332,0.0005594975,0.0001817212,0.007027569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775462,0.0003723101,0.0055582,0.001228658,0.00004205712,0.006208576,0.001324337,0.000248704,0.007470977],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02907749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1537784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.160651830181602,"score_gpt":0.3842807148356255,"score_spread":0.2236288846540235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}