{"id":"W1558838234","doi":"","title":"The Case for Constructive Ambiguity in a Regulated System: Canadian Banks and the 'Too Big to Fail' Problem","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Constructive; Credibility; Too big to fail; Dilemma; Moral hazard; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Business; Economics; Hazard; Actuarial science; Political science; Law; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Incentive; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007282335,0.0003700037,0.0004742438,0.001556149,0.02398583,0.01311913,0.001984568,0.006047035,0.003084456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01990745,0.0003431256,0.000463866,0.002633556,0.0299543,0.00308861,0.003732445,0.007281939,0.0001747427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1015819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1162585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9558591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9555873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900124,0.002169068,0.0001841279,0.0007159048,0.004138127,0.002780359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885769,0.003865326,0.00131457,0.0006003964,0.00391145,0.001731254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003537695,0.00001190621,0.003546711,0.00004091496,0.00001006655,0.0003559976,0.01202307,0.00125976,0.0002047821,0.960868,0.01317692,0.008466502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001523615,0.00004640015,0.02927151,0.0005583687,0.00008157612,0.0004873465,0.03277371,0.006631817,0.0009900234,0.618307,0.3103282,0.0003717183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.261024,0.007269136,0.01253117,0.3179832,0.0006013167,0.0001318514,0.0002248739,0.00007842274,0.400156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814383,0.001215453,0.001529302,0.009962477,0.00008957391,0.00002277947,0.00002175542,0.00001273261,0.005707643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1015819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.737032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009516363588695117,"score_gpt":0.2021916243924799,"score_spread":0.1926752608037848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}