{"id":"W1558838234","doi":"","title":"The Case for Constructive Ambiguity in a Regulated System: Canadian Banks and the 'Too Big to Fail' Problem","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Constructive; Credibility; Too big to fail; Dilemma; Moral hazard; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Business; Economics; Hazard; Actuarial science; Political science; Law; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Incentive; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002122156,0.0001110746,0.0002299442,0.0001454725,0.0005728019,0.00012807,0.0001652323,0.0000702313,0.000002046253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001595777,0.00007912613,0.00007356732,0.0002741845,0.00007740668,0.00007761354,0.00001121626,0.0004149625,0.000007988775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001182731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000669799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02793858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3867533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998202,0.00003706043,0.0004267596,0.0001853637,0.00002909345,0.001119705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994393,0.00005545268,0.0001828049,0.0001373128,0.00006623344,0.0001188892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008932713,0.000003481161,0.0006437047,0.000002338865,0.00002251949,0.000009510517,0.00025017,0.00003608639,6.849446e-7,0.9700924,0.0001441481,0.02870561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002214798,0.0002108881,0.01125314,0.00002282322,0.00001055069,0.002244122,0.003659334,0.0009909379,0.000003808179,0.9564701,0.02272359,0.0001959039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9599084,0.008988099,0.002800887,0.01873802,0.0003378852,0.0012285,0.00006683132,0.00001906206,0.007912273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987058,0.0004799739,0.00003773276,0.0002671903,0.00007936386,0.00001853535,0.00000106929,0.000007520146,0.0004028245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3588147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9785345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009516363588695117,"score_gpt":0.2021916243924799,"score_spread":0.1926752608037848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}