{"id":"W1559673614","doi":"10.22230/jem.2011v12n1a42","title":"Persistent climate corridors: The identification of climate refugia for the selection of candidate areas for conservation.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Climate change; Baseline (sea); Environmental resource management; Species distribution; Geography; Distribution (mathematics); Ecosystem; Environmental science; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001931473,0.0005847215,0.0003111244,0.00291588,0.000821346,0.001280672,0.0005590306,0.0002889657,0.003448623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004494777,0.0002342919,0.0007675139,0.002831684,0.0003444443,0.0007826519,0.001436615,0.0005143706,0.0004917165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007220715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00154833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02394007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08274342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995686,0.0001434979,0.00003410221,0.0001052378,0.00007645721,0.00007201976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978911,0.0005675881,0.0006239282,0.000215081,0.0003895947,0.00031268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003873511,0.00008998632,0.8808929,0.0002401439,0.0002157005,0.0004236957,0.0009119375,0.0258204,0.002881006,0.003058607,0.006198904,0.07887948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006251656,0.0002216941,0.7651426,0.0001475269,0.0002111075,0.0006425978,0.003454162,0.2047715,0.00197331,0.0058887,0.01738967,0.00009458174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9417465,0.0008119202,0.03522208,0.000256254,0.00003608132,0.0003532999,0.01497253,0.0007212805,0.005879951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384469,0.000197966,0.04961032,0.00002189924,0.000006522546,0.0001933746,0.01057391,0.00007233843,0.000876845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02394007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0476014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0339731162644759,"score_gpt":0.2418565267489415,"score_spread":0.2078834104844656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}