{"id":"W1560043476","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1326","title":"Does gender diversity on corporate boards increase risk‐taking?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender diversity; Diversity (politics); Business; Sample (material); Cash; Scholarship; Officer; Perception; Accounting; Corporate governance; Finance; Political science; Psychology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01131163,0.0002660351,0.0003504217,0.0006156825,0.007481454,0.0007427991,0.001537359,0.0001807113,0.0002559295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006495266,0.0002111818,0.0001688513,0.001649462,0.009501719,0.00157096,0.00005984351,0.0004342686,0.00001653204],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002081262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02374374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1624341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8546326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957711,0.001195605,0.0005636595,0.0005337382,0.0007473858,0.001188553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992871,0.0003093619,0.001926786,0.0002039041,0.001013312,0.003675672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001197392,0.0000906044,0.7568007,0.00002433001,0.00004529391,0.0006836457,0.1453384,0.0007123244,0.00001888988,0.09389162,0.001379976,0.0008945031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001190001,0.008817724,0.3252388,0.0002432832,0.0002057675,0.0003610922,0.4181376,0.0005457271,0.0005946039,0.2328108,0.01059861,0.001255995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9457735,0.00007109234,0.0003451629,0.001759655,0.001630858,0.0002110885,0.0001516326,0.00001779302,0.05003916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961172,0.00002956,0.002591634,0.0003988064,0.0004901593,0.000002104043,0.000004039232,0.0000067073,0.0003597472],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6921984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3602775029409473,"score_gpt":0.3539010599067285,"score_spread":0.006376443034218804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}