{"id":"W1560125408","doi":"10.1007/3-540-45672-4_49","title":"Empirical Evaluation of Agile Processes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; SAIT Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Agile software development; Computer science; Waterfall; Waterfall model; Extreme programming practices; User story; Empirical research; Key (lock); Agile usability engineering; Extreme programming; Knowledge management; Software engineering; Process management; Software; Engineering management; Software development; Software development process; Engineering; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03884733,0.0004680969,0.0003539709,0.003042657,0.00114499,0.001929009,0.001387839,0.0008204819,0.004062545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1675937,0.0004336859,0.0003806016,0.002802381,0.001753107,0.003014022,0.002437918,0.001332783,0.0008744848],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002355905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002556213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002564225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002468381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9532109,0.03399673,0.002882583,0.001435733,0.007307036,0.001166865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6192383,0.3005508,0.01753183,0.01835953,0.04022616,0.004093289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00940829,0.023872,0.4839859,0.001608192,0.0004460096,0.0004734906,0.05438733,0.004840347,0.006050957,0.02203537,0.004033192,0.388859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001632678,0.03704563,0.8345048,0.001444404,0.0006756423,0.0008542235,0.0510477,0.01915507,0.02064908,0.00924884,0.02353481,0.0002070771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877433,0.0002686121,0.00263853,0.0001287805,0.00001824289,0.0002992573,0.0001352519,0.00001785816,0.00875021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963463,0.0001203888,0.001967005,0.00003032454,0.00001091396,0.0002722509,0.0002032189,0.0000102379,0.001039435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03884733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2054468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06184688523139632,"score_gpt":0.3230707004500306,"score_spread":0.2612238152186342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}