{"id":"W1561322135","doi":"10.22230/jem.2011v12n1a89","title":"A Vulnerability-Based Strategy for Incorporating the Climate Threat in Conservation Planning: A Case Study from the British Columbia Central Interior","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Nature Conservancy of Canada","funders":"Ministry of Environment; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Climate change; Environmental resource management; Context (archaeology); Vulnerability assessment; Geography; Adaptive capacity; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Ecology; Computer science; Psychological resilience","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001676349,0.0004594013,0.0002478848,0.001293376,0.008514104,0.003061392,0.001586735,0.001195196,0.002410293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003611506,0.0002883347,0.0002915057,0.002348915,0.002167643,0.0007204568,0.002041462,0.001462984,0.0001123136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02004996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02165583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9104026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9741606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985049,0.0006905614,0.00003716458,0.00007776554,0.0002754001,0.000414213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981784,0.0007483167,0.00009095904,0.000121475,0.0004068353,0.0004541082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004423726,0.001339172,0.2179872,0.000678662,0.0002937786,0.05695791,0.07802947,0.248959,0.008196518,0.06155692,0.03087175,0.2946872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002827858,0.000916213,0.2632648,0.0007697004,0.0004302548,0.007323006,0.3441019,0.1653389,0.005012333,0.02218005,0.1898939,0.000486107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9283611,0.0004200918,0.005310383,0.002878352,0.00002593001,0.0004290495,0.0001899358,0.00007039869,0.06231476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813973,0.0003759002,0.01022765,0.000321098,0.000006380749,0.0001557198,0.00008851248,0.00002257183,0.007404736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0895974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07338746100697163,"score_gpt":0.2722202877234321,"score_spread":0.1988328267164605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}