{"id":"W1561510931","doi":"10.1002/ieam.1473","title":"Predicted no effect concentration derivation as a significant source of variability in environmental hazard assessments of chemicals in aquatic systems: An international analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Hazard; Environmental science; Scope (computer science); European union; Environmental health; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Computer science; Business; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00112499,0.0003451446,0.0005792984,0.000240611,0.00005440514,0.00003628065,0.0003409166,0.0002088153,0.003921933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000199748,0.0003263974,0.00009367326,0.0003871334,0.0004950896,0.0006572819,0.0003178409,0.000251191,0.00005375126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00116102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008148428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007778841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006210063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966373,0.0007120628,0.001010663,0.0007270639,0.0005383417,0.0003745898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988992,0.0001835635,0.0004105725,0.0003762477,0.000002303686,0.000128087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001048503,0.001510885,0.8378475,0.0000376445,0.0002820268,0.000007217614,0.0001279949,0.005220449,0.1498494,0.00004413541,0.00002003193,0.004947935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001527185,0.0006439537,0.8797468,0.00003879398,0.0001963149,0.000002129746,0.000715756,0.1090276,0.007602351,0.0001195128,0.0001101517,0.000269486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916711,0.00001027282,0.001943109,0.00002932415,0.0001150246,0.00182448,0.00003722319,0.00001772069,0.004351687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970989,0.0002677333,0.001263875,0.00005645352,0.000008682432,0.0004921556,0.0005157655,0.00001940715,0.0002770683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.142247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00485408538535816,"score_gpt":0.2490959853975744,"score_spread":0.2442419000122162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}