{"id":"W1564430712","doi":"10.15353/cfs-rcea.v2i1.29","title":"Local food, farmland, and urban development: A case of land grabbing North American style","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Food Studies / La Revue canadienne des études sur l alimentation","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Zoning; Speculation; Land grabbing; Food security; Investment (military); Food processing; Business; Land use; Agriculture; Environmental planning; Geography; Political science; Politics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002462797,0.0002612328,0.000370873,0.00006483873,0.0003546571,0.0000481542,0.0001366869,0.00005310652,0.000004527097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007047513,0.0001334551,0.00004344045,0.0005864546,0.0002425242,0.0001541515,0.00006246382,0.0000947112,0.000002376358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007128338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001024823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1334002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985186,0.00009133654,0.0003602075,0.0003675313,0.0001056587,0.000556643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985433,0.0001260479,0.000179311,0.00006130002,0.0003167033,0.0007733874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009932015,0.00008684633,0.7875168,0.0002189772,0.001340573,0.0009047989,0.05471155,0.00009216492,0.0001368847,0.002545439,0.0009982463,0.1513484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009892178,0.001816725,0.8775442,0.000143332,0.0001473504,0.0009195773,0.09050389,0.0000406582,0.0005377982,0.0003531486,0.02607048,0.0009336792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980122,0.001116685,0.000002986066,0.0001612662,0.00008242937,0.000305341,0.0001617581,0.00002677744,0.0001305477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991791,0.00009127449,0.0002101571,0.0001430117,0.00005657194,0.00005620713,0.0001948162,0.00000409418,0.00006480103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8626602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8723705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04251038351182025,"score_gpt":0.2147961845456383,"score_spread":0.172285801033818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}