{"id":"W1565708894","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01842.x","title":"Ecohydrological feedbacks in peatland development: a theoretical modelling study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Queen Mary University of London","keywords":"Peat; Ecohydrology; Environmental science; Anoxic waters; Bog; Litter; Soil science; Hydrology (agriculture); Atmospheric sciences; Geology; Ecology; Ecosystem","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009502653,0.0001139545,0.0003299671,0.0001046277,0.00005661131,0.000006838683,0.0002824116,0.000130622,0.005162746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004512441,0.00007978678,0.00005038387,0.0001155213,0.0001824173,0.00009312307,0.0001456813,0.0003029618,0.00009091148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001065887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002998276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002304258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007541848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986643,0.0001696175,0.0005379532,0.0001716644,0.000130617,0.0003258678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994977,0.000106749,0.0001807681,0.00009035222,0.00001197356,0.0001124179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000212919,0.0009164604,0.9936607,9.207463e-7,0.00002205815,0.0005248233,0.002138111,0.001653019,0.00003499174,0.0003097149,0.00008955436,0.0004366555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001574936,0.001384545,0.9865967,0.000003306203,0.00001868121,0.0002854422,0.0001983237,0.002284737,0.00003438845,0.007017068,0.0004773065,0.0001245381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859139,0.000009240611,0.0005371064,0.00007815312,0.0001420505,0.0001108734,1.886938e-7,0.000004668358,0.01320384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975611,0.00001148019,0.002216105,0.0001151517,0.00003893769,0.000005396896,4.894816e-7,0.000006370645,0.000044976],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01315886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02614714146001929,"score_gpt":0.2281436953198453,"score_spread":0.201996553859826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}