{"id":"W1566145832","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2005v30n4a1585","title":"Civility in Online Discussion: The Case of the Foreign Policy Dialogue","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Government (linguistics); Civil discourse; Civil society; Discourse analysis; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Public discourse; Public administration; Law; Politics; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0155732,0.0007155048,0.0006358514,0.002114397,0.03987389,0.01418293,0.002253736,0.01035072,0.008850107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0290874,0.0005428474,0.000766318,0.002659172,0.02229759,0.01461828,0.01082297,0.006288812,0.0013026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006632179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00498792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01064256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01258491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9763558,0.01997337,0.0002740289,0.0006889964,0.001236586,0.001471346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586499,0.03529387,0.001356252,0.001293695,0.001052582,0.002353695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002010106,0.0001930587,0.00266488,0.0001953547,0.00002091171,0.01378375,0.8218064,0.0008965313,0.001530413,0.141719,0.005065996,0.0119227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001091379,0.0001018837,0.001790726,0.0003402473,0.0000325008,0.004068323,0.7229335,0.003328732,0.002161898,0.0460182,0.2190252,0.00008970952],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6791673,0.0008948978,0.01714009,0.03472023,0.0006157192,0.00026224,0.0001348628,0.0002089968,0.2668557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839147,0.0002343672,0.003814423,0.001350187,0.0001572014,0.0001477518,0.00003649776,0.00008546425,0.01025936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03987389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08235997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0316745073361392,"score_gpt":0.3239043377745853,"score_spread":0.2922298304384461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}