{"id":"W1567434173","doi":"10.18174/121929","title":"Rebuilding common property management : a case study of community-based natural resource management in rural Guizhou, China","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Natural resource management; Common-pool resource; Property management; Property (philosophy); Natural resource; Natural (archaeology); Geography; Environmental resource management; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental planning; Resource management (computing); Business; Political science; Computer science; Environmental science; Ecology; Archaeology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002030724,0.0004092747,0.0003326975,0.001227787,0.01057208,0.001787866,0.002680261,0.002034396,0.003100668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001909117,0.0002284649,0.0003588045,0.001393707,0.004901697,0.001786085,0.003028576,0.001255527,0.0001758455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008450056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00579948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2229083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981969,0.0008134735,0.00004041993,0.00016048,0.0001782699,0.0006104747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985874,0.0003946893,0.0001496895,0.0001155671,0.0001620093,0.0005907996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002458175,0.002495316,0.1280568,0.0004613635,0.0001230467,0.1088525,0.6151479,0.008599121,0.01056155,0.03911484,0.00548464,0.08085717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007273487,0.001013682,0.08937712,0.0002271111,0.00007322946,0.004092484,0.8300645,0.01522477,0.002303213,0.004817861,0.05263538,0.00009796904],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942098,0.0001300328,0.0007984567,0.0007780037,0.000008311223,0.0001019981,0.00001327427,0.00001290485,0.003947296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956054,0.0001550319,0.001096288,0.0001243623,0.000005166607,0.00003268213,0.00001899481,0.000007146984,0.002954772],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.102024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2028604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01314240864551926,"score_gpt":0.2846980556733954,"score_spread":0.2715556470278762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}